Witam, mam prosbe o analize tego rozdania.
Seat 1: O'Patricus ($7.35 in chips)
Seat 2: Supermahoni ($26.92 in chips)
Seat 3: looyoou ($19.12 in chips)
Seat 4: segard ($25 in chips)
Seat 5: dejate ($32.21 in chips)
Seat 6: Rabler ($46.04 in chips)
O'Patricus: posts small blind $0.10
Supermahoni: posts big blind $0.25
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Rabler [ ]
looyoou: folds
segard: raises $0.60 to $0.85
dejate: folds
Rabler: calls $0.85
O'Patricus: folds
Supermahoni: calls $0.60
*** FLOP *** [ ]
Supermahoni: checks
segard: checks
Rabler: bets $1.50
Supermahoni: raises $3 to $4.50
segard: folds
Rabler: calls $3
*** TURN *** [ ] []
Supermahoni: bets $
Rabler: calls $9
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
Supermahoni: bets $12.57 and is all-in
Rabler: calls $12.57
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Supermahoni: shows [9s 9d] (three of a kind, Nines)
Rabler: shows [Jc Qh] (a straight, Nine to King)
Rabler collected $52.79 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $54.79 | Rake $2
Board [Qc 9c 6s Th Kc]
Seat 1: O'Patricus (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: Supermahoni (big blind) showed [9s 9d] and lost with three of a kind, Nines
Seat 3: looyoou folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: segard folded on the Flop
Seat 5: dejate folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Rabler (button) showed [Jc Qh] and won ($52.79) with a straight, Nine to King
Rabler to ja.
Generalnie rozdanie wygralem ale caly czas odnosze wrazenie ze po raise do 4.5 nie powinno mnie juz tam byc, ale jednak mialem TOP pare.
Nie mam statystyk przeciwnika, ale troche z nim juz gralem i wiedzialem, ze grywa raczej spokojnie. To bylo pierwsze rozdanie jakie z nim widzialem o wieksza pule. Wczesniej wszystkie jego podbicia jakie pamietam nie byly sprawdzane.
Prosze o jakies uwagi, co zle/dobrze zrobilem. Szczegolnie uzgledniajac pogrubione fragmenty